In 1823, trapper Hugh Glass survived a grizzly bear attack in present-day South Dakota after being left behind by companions. The men had taken his weapons and equipment. Reaching a trading post would mean more than recovering from the bear: he had to make the journey without the tools he normally depended on to stay alive.
Listen to “Hugh Glass” on Spreaker.
The Wild Frontier
Glass joined the Henry & Ashley fur-trading enterprise in 1823. Contemporary records place him among the men wounded during the June attack at the Arikara villages. Later that summer, he traveled with a smaller overland brigade led by Andrew Henry, rather than a hundred men all present at the bear attack.
The change of route mattered. After fighting along the Missouri, the partners sent men overland toward their trapping grounds and posts. Henry was trying to reach his men near the mouth of the Yellowstone. The brigade traveled on foot with pack animals; it was not an expedition with wagons available to carry a badly wounded man.
Glass’s work included hunting for food. It took him ahead of the other men and into the encounter that would outlast almost everything else known about his life.
The Grizzly Attack
Historical accounts place the attack in late summer 1823 near the Grand River in present-day South Dakota. Glass was hunting ahead of Henry’s party when a female grizzly attacked him. Accounts describe companions killing the bear and finding him badly wounded.
The outcome survives in an unusually early piece of evidence. In a July 1824 letter, fellow trapper Daniel Potts reported that a man had been badly mauled by a bear, left without a gun, and recovered. Potts’s brief account lacks the elaborate fight scenes of later versions. It nevertheless preserves the central fact that made the story remarkable: the man abandoned after the attack had lived.
Abandoned in the Wilderness
According to the early accounts, Henry’s party left two volunteers to care for Glass and bury him if he died. The men eventually departed while he was still alive, taking his weapons and equipment.
James Hall’s 1825 telling describes the volunteers rejoining the expedition and reporting that Glass had died and been buried. They produced his possessions as evidence. In that version, the equipment served two purposes: it was useful to the men who carried it away, and it helped persuade their companions that its owner no longer needed it.
John Fitzgerald is named in early retellings. The younger caretaker is commonly identified as Jim Bridger, but that identification rests on later and disputed evidence. Whatever the younger man’s name, the arrangement intended to leave Glass with care had ended in abandonment.
The Awakening
Glass survived long enough to begin moving toward help. In Hall’s account, the first destination was a spring only a short distance away. He crawled to it and remained nearby, eating berries within reach while recovering enough strength to attempt the journey onward.
That is a smaller beginning than the famous image of a man crossing hundreds of miles. Before there could be a return to the trading posts, there had to be water and food close enough for an injured man to reach. Hall’s narrative was published in 1825, not recorded as a daily log, but it gives the earliest extended version of that struggle.
The Crawl Through Hell
The traditional account puts Fort Kiowa roughly 200 miles away. The Museum of the Mountain Man describes a journey that began with crawling, continued with hobbling and walking, and included travel by water. Saying he crawled all 200 miles compresses a changing journey into a single repeated action.
The problem was not distance alone. He also had to obtain food without his usual hunting equipment. Retellings describe plants and meat from a buffalo calf killed by wolves. The buffalo episode already appears in Hall’s early account: Glass obtains food from a kill he could not have made himself. It was a way of continuing without the rifle that had previously helped supply an entire party.
His recovery changed what he could attempt. Crawling became movement on his feet; reaching water opened another means of travel. Fort Kiowa was the destination that could bring shelter, supplies and other people back within reach.
The People Who Saved Him
Indigenous assistance appears in the traditional story. The Museum of the Mountain Man describes Lakota people providing a hide boat, allowing Glass to travel down the Missouri toward Fort Kiowa. That account makes the river part of the escape and help from other people part of his survival.
The story is often remembered as a test of one man’s endurance. Yet the version involving the boat turns on something endurance alone could not provide: transport. Glass still had to reach help, but he did not have to complete every remaining mile on injured limbs.
Timeline of Events
- June 1823: Glass is wounded in the fighting at the Arikara villages while employed by Henry and Ashley.
- Late summer 1823: A bear mauls him during Henry’s overland journey. Two caretakers subsequently leave him behind.
- Autumn 1823: He reaches Fort Kiowa. The familiar account places the journey at roughly 200 miles, using more than one means of travel.
- June 1824: Glass reaches Fitzgerald at Fort Atkinson and recovers his rifle.
- 1825: Hall’s The Missouri Trapper brings an extended version of the ordeal into print.
- 1833: Glass is killed near Fort Cass on the Yellowstone, after continuing his fur-trade career.
The Revenge Hunt
Glass later traveled in pursuit of his stolen equipment and the man who had abandoned him. The 1825 account describes revenge as well as recovery of his weapons. Reaching safety had solved one problem without settling the other: the men who had left him were somewhere ahead.
He did reach John Fitzgerald at Fort Atkinson in 1824. By then Fitzgerald had enlisted in the U.S. Army. Glass did not kill him and recovered his rifle. The encounter ended without the fatal confrontation that a revenge story seems to promise.
The rifle gives the pursuit a practical weight as well as an emotional one. It was equipment with which a trapper could hunt and resume his work. Its recovery belonged to the life Glass was returning to, even though it could not undo the abandonment.
What Doesn’t Add Up in the Legend?
- Was the younger caretaker Jim Bridger? Historian Jerry Enzler notes that the earliest accounts leave the youth unnamed. A later writer called him “Bridges,” and much later tradition identified Bridger. The evidence does not securely establish the familiar scene of Glass confronting and forgiving the young Bridger.
- How far did he crawl? Accounts disagree about distance and the stages of the journey. The roughly 200-mile figure is a traditional total, not a measured track showing that every mile was covered on hands and knees.
- Which vivid scenes are history? The South Dakota Historical Society Foundation’s account explicitly draws detailed scenes from Frederick Manfred’s novel Lord Grizzly. A broken leg being set, precise dialogue and medical treatments need evidence beyond a fictional retelling. They should not quietly become facts simply because the overall survival story is true.
The Legend of Hugh Glass
Hugh Glass returned to life on the frontier, continuing to work as a trapper despite the injuries he had suffered. The National Park Service’s history follows him beyond the bear story: by 1828 he was representing trappers seeking another supplier, and he later hunted meat for Fort Union while also trapping nearby.
Men who knew him gave a keelboat his name, Old Glass. A Fort Union clerk, James Archdale Hamilton, wrote down Glass’s experiences with the intention of publishing them, but that manuscript has been lost. The survivor continued to tell stories while others were already turning his life into one.
Glass was killed in 1833 in an Arikara attack near Fort Cass. His return from the bear mauling had given him years, not immunity from the dangers of his work.
Writers kept returning to the ordeal, and in 2015 The Revenant, starring Leonardo DiCaprio, brought a fictionalized version to a worldwide audience. The historical ending is less tidy than the film’s revenge plot. Glass recovered his rifle and went back to work. A man left behind as beyond saving had recovered enough of his life to choose what to do with it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was Hugh Glass a real person?
Yes. Fur-trade records establish his presence in 1823, and Potts’s 1824 letter records the mauling, abandonment and recovery.
Did he crawl 200 miles?
That is the famous shorthand. The museum’s reconstruction describes crawling, walking and river travel across a journey traditionally put at about 200 miles.
Did Hugh Glass kill Fitzgerald?
No. Glass found him at Fort Atkinson in 1824 after Fitzgerald had joined the Army. Glass recovered his rifle.
How accurate is The Revenant?
It uses the real ordeal as a starting point. Its central storyline involving Glass’s son is not documented history; the museum’s film comparison finds no evidence for that family story.
What happened to Glass afterward?
He continued trapping and working in the fur trade. He was killed near Fort Cass on the Yellowstone in 1833.
Sources & References
These sources distinguish the early record, later historical reconstructions and fictional retellings.
- Museum of the Mountain Man — Hugh Glass
Historical overview of the bear attack, early published account, journey to Fort Kiowa and recovery of his equipment. - Museum of the Mountain Man — HughGlass.org — Grizzly Attack
The expedition’s leadership and accounts of the attack, care and abandonment. - Rocky Mountain Fur Trade Journal / HughGlass.org — Did Bridger Abandon Hugh Glass?
Jerry Enzler’s historical analysis explains why naming Jim Bridger as the second caretaker remains uncertain. - Museum of the Mountain Man — HughGlass.org — The Revenant: The Movie and the Real Story
Separates film invention from the historical setting and the later search for Fitzgerald. - South Dakota Historical Society Foundation — The Saga of Hugh Glass
A state historical discussion of the Glass legend and its literary retelling in Frederick Manfred’s novel Lord Grizzly. - James Hall — The Missouri Trapper (1825)
Early published narrative, read in the scanned original; used with attribution rather than as a daily eyewitness record. - Museum of the Mountain Man — Chronology of the Hugh Glass sources
Publication history and the text of Potts’s brief 1824 report. - National Park Service — Beyond the Bear: Hugh Glass on the Upper Missouri
His later work, the lost Hamilton manuscript and his death in 1833.
Related stories
Explore this topic
Older story links now lead to the homepage: Dyatlov Pass legacy link · Vesna Vulović legacy link · Andes disaster legacy link.
Watch This Story on YouTube
Prefer to watch? See the full story on our YouTube channel.
